![]() I get where you're going with this in that "it just needs to work", but it sounds like what you're looking to do is have a landing page that effectively displays 4 application widgets inside it. To why it "just doesn't work like that" until we're blue in the face, but our clients only know that "it doesn't work right."Īnd if it just doesn't work right, they'll move on to another provider or spend the time and $$ to do it custom themselves. This is exactly where we, as a community, see if MS is capable of having its technical product teams (SharePoint infrastructure, SharePoint dev, Security, AD, FBA, FIM) work agile-ly to provide a solution that solves this problem. But it doesn't seem to round out the vision for an MS app store. If that's not the goal, and if they only want corporate app stores usable by domain-joined and GPO affectable (that a word?) machines, then that's cool, I guess. If MS wants this to be a viable app model, they've got to tell the app creation community how to solve this problem. It's simply got to *work* or our clients will go elsewhere.Ĭan you imagine telling an iphone or Android app creator that they have to have their end users play with phone settings just to get their app to work without annoying the end user? ![]() ![]() IeDaddy, I love your enthusiasm, but you see how this is still essentially an unsolved problem, right? From a technical perspective, I hear your suggestions, but if this model is to stand up against the iPhone model or the Android model, we can't fiddleĪnd futz and put ducktape on the core problem. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |